NEGOTIATING REPRODUCTIVE AGENCY: SOCIAL REGULATION AND EMBODIED KNOWLEDGE IN BUGIS-MAKASSAR WOMEN’S RESPONSES TO PREGNANCY RISK

Authors

  • Cindy Israeni Ansar Universitas Hasanuddin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62567/ijosse.v1i3.1191

Keywords:

reproductive governance, AGIL, medical pluralism, Bugis-Makassar, threatened miscarriage, embodied agency, maternal health, Indonesia, moral regulation

Abstract

This study explores how Bugis-Makassar women construct and navigate plural reproductive knowledge in response to abortus imminens (threatened miscarriage), drawing on Talcott Parsons’ AGIL framework to analyze the sociocultural functions of care practices. Based on ethnographic fieldwork in Makassar, Indonesia, including interviews and participant observation with ten pregnant women, the study reveals that reproductive behavior is shaped by adaptive strategies (A), collective goals (G), moral integration (I), and intergenerational transmission of norms (L). Rather than following a singular medical logic, women mobilize syncretic forms of care that blend biomedical treatment, spiritual rituals, and ancestral taboos. These plural responses reflect not only epistemic hybridity but also reproductive governance enacted through kinship, religious authority, and clinical institutions. Women's agency is expressed not through open resistance, but through strategic moral navigation and embodied alignment with normative expectations—a form of what Mahmood terms the ethics of self-formation. The findings challenge biomedical-centric approaches to maternal health and highlight the need for culturally responsive interventions that respect local logics of risk, protection, and care. This study contributes to sociological debates on medical pluralism, moral regulation, and the reproduction of gendered knowledge in the Global South.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abu-Lughod, L. (1991). Writing against culture. In R. G. Fox (Ed.), Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present (pp. 137–162). Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.

Béhague, D. P., & Storeng, K. T. (2008). Collapsing the vertical–horizontal divide: An ethnographic study of evidence-based policymaking in maternal health. American Journal of Public Health, 98(4), 644–649. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.123117

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City: Anchor Books.

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

England, K. V. (1994). Getting personal: Reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. The Professional Geographer, 46(1), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00080.x

Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction. New York: Vintage Books.

Ginsburg, F., & Rapp, R. (1995). Conceiving the new world order: The global politics of reproduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in Practice (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

Janes, C. R., & Corbett, K. K. (2009). Anthropology and global health. Annual Review of Anthropology, 38, 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-091908-164314

Jordan, B. (1997). Authoritative Knowledge and Its Construction. In R. E. Davis-Floyd & C. Sargent (Eds.), Childbirth and Authoritative Knowledge: Cross-Cultural Perspectives (pp. 55–79). Berkeley: University of California Press.

Kleinman, A. (1980). Patients and Healers in the Context of Culture: An Exploration of the Borderland between Anthropology, Medicine, and Psychiatry. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Liamputtong, P. (2007). Researching the Vulnerable: A Guide to Sensitive Research Methods. London: Sage Publications.

Lock, M., & Nguyen, V. K. (2010). An Anthropology of Biomedicine. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Martin, E. (1987). The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Boston: Beacon Press.

Millar, S. B. (1989). Bugis Weddings: Rituals of Social Location in Modern Indonesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Morgan, L. M., & Roberts, E. F. S. (2012). Reproductive governance in Latin America. Anthropology & Medicine, 19(2), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2012.675046

Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.

Spradley, J. P. (1979). The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Van Hollen, C. (2003). Birth on the Threshold: Childbirth and Modernity in South India. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Published

2025-09-01

How to Cite

Cindy Israeni Ansar. (2025). NEGOTIATING REPRODUCTIVE AGENCY: SOCIAL REGULATION AND EMBODIED KNOWLEDGE IN BUGIS-MAKASSAR WOMEN’S RESPONSES TO PREGNANCY RISK. Indonesian Journal of Social Science and Education (IJOSSE), 1(3), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.62567/ijosse.v1i3.1191

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.