ANALISIS STRATEGI MULTIMODAL: NAVIGASI PROSES INTERAKSI DALAM ANALISIS WACANA KELAS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62567/micjo.v2i1.547Keywords:
Interaksi kelas, multimodal analisis, proses belajar mengajar, analisis wacana kelas, model pengajaran bahasa InggrisAbstract
Interaksi kelas adalah kerangka kerja metodologis holistik yang mengintegrasikan pembelajaran bahasa secara verbal dan non-verbal dalam proses belajar mengajar. Dalam konteks penggunaan bahasa di bidang pendidikan saat ini, khususnya di ruang kelas, para guru perlu memahami bagaimana guru dapat menggunakan metode pengajaran yang seimbang di ruang kelas, hal ini juga berkaitan dengan pola penggunaan bahasa, dan interaksi terdepan dalam pembuatan makna. Analisis wacana kelas memfasilitasi pengguna bahasa untuk menciptakan iklim yang positif dalam proses belajar mengajar. Penelitian ini menyelidiki model pola dan interaksi multimodal dalam wacana kelas dengan membandingkan dua strategi yang digunakan oleh guru pemula dan guru yang sudah berpengalaman. Penelitian ini menggunakan kerangka kerja wacana kelas yang diusulkan oleh Walsh (2011) dan interaksi multimodal (SF-MDA) oleh Norris (2004, 2019) di dua kelas dengan dua guru yang berbeda. Hasilnya, analisis interaksi multimodal menyatakan bahwa guru pemula dan guru berpengalaman memiliki dimensi interaksi yang berbeda dalam meningkatkan kemampuan siswa dalam belajar bahasa terutama bahasa inggris sebagai bahasa asing berdasarkan kesalahan dalam pemerolehan bahasa. Selain itu, guru juga meningkatkan fokus siswa pada pola pembelajaran yang benar dengan meningkatkan proses interaksi didalam kelas. Dengan demikian, guru pemula dan guru yang sudah berpengalaman sama-sama menggunakan pola wacana kelas berdasarkan teori Analisis Wacana Kelas. Wacana menjadi pendekatan metodologis yang merupakan analisis berlapis-lapis di balik komunikasi verbal atau lisan untuk mengidentifikasi sumber daya interaksi yang digunakan. Implikasi dari penelitian ini yaitu Analisis Wacana Kelas dengan Model IRF meningkatkan kepercayaan diri, kefasihan siswa, dan kemampuan siswa dalam belajar bahasa Inggris sebagai bahasa asing.
Downloads
References
Alwasilah, A. C. (2011). Pokoknya kualitatif: Dasar-dasar merancang dan melakukan penelitian kualitatif. PT Dunia Pustaka Jaya.
Ardiansah, D. (2018). A study of teachers’ verbal feedback on students’ oral response in EFL classrooms. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Brophy, J. (2004). Motivating students to learn (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Creswell, J. C. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publication.
Daniels, E. (2011). Creating motivating learning environments: Teachers matter. Middle School Journal, 43(2), 32–37.
D’Mello, S. K., Olney, A. M., Blanchard, N., Sun, X., Ward, B., Samei, B., & Kelly, S. (2015). Multimodal capture of teacher-student interactions for automated dialogic analysis in live classrooms. ICMI 2015 - Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, 557–566. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818346.2830602
Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1(1), 1–18.
Esmaeili, F., & Behnam, B. (2014). A study of corrective feedback and learner’s uptake in classroom interactions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 3(4), 204–212.
Evnitskaya, N., & Berger, E. (2017). Learners’ multimodal displays of willingness to participate in classroom interaction in the L2 and CLIL contexts. Classroom Discourse, 8(1), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2016.1272062
Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Gibson, W. J. (2014). Sequential order in multimodal discourse: Talk and text in online educational interaction. Discourse and Communication, 8(1), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481313503222
Kääntä, L. (2015). The multimodal organisation of teacher-led classroom interaction. In C. J. Jenks & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), nternational Perspectives on ELT Classroom Interaction (pp. 64–65). Palgrave Macmillan.
Kagimoto, E., & Rodgers, M. P. H. (2007). Students’ perception of corrective feedback. JALT Conference Proceedings.
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality. A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
Kress, G. R. (2010). Multimodality: a social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
Lim, V. F. (2019). Analysing the teachers’ use of gestures in the classroom: A Systemic Functional Multimodal Discourse Analysis approach. Social Semiotics, 29(1), 83–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1412168
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classroom. Language Learning, 46(1), 1–40.
Malik, R. S., & Hamied, F. A. (2016). Research methods : A guide for first time researchers (2nd ed.). UPI Press.
Moro, L., Mortimer, E. F., & Tiberghien, A. (2020). The use of social semiotic multimodality and joint action theory to describe teaching practices: Two cases studies with experienced teachers. Classroom Discourse, 11(3), 229–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2019.1570528
Noor, N. M., Aman, I., Mustaffa, R., & Seong, T. K. (2010). Teacher’s verbal feedback on students’ response: A Malaysian ESL classroom discourse analysis. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 398–405.
Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. Routledge.
Norris, S. (2019). Systematically working with multimodal data: Research methods in multimodal discourse analysis. Wiley-Blackwell.
Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 34(4), 575–595.
Park, J. (2017). Multimodality as an interactional resource for classroom interactional competence (CIC). Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 121–138. www.ejal.eu
Pouromid, S. (2019). Towards multimodal interactions in the multilingual EFL classroom: Lessons from a COIL experience. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(3), 627–637. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i3.15262
Rao, H. L. N., & Kulkarni, I. (2013). A study on language and linguistics in English. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, 2(9), 98–102. www.garph.co.uk
Shields, C. (2007). Bakhtin primer. Peter Lang.
Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. The Guilford Press.
Suherdi, D. (2009). Classroom discourse analysis: A systemiotic approach. Celitics Press.
Taylor, R. (2014). Meaning between, in and around words, gestures and postures - multimodal meaning-making in children’s classroom discourse. Language and Education, 28(5), 401–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2014.885038
Twiner, A., Littleton, K., Whitelock, D., & Coffin, C. (2021). Combining sociocultural discourse analysis and multimodal analysis to explore teachers’ and pupils’ meaning making. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 30, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100520
Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse language in action. Routledge.
Wilmes, S. E. D., & Siry, C. (2021). Multimodal interaction analysis: A powerful tool for examining plurilingual students’ engagement in science practices. Research in Science Education, 51(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09977-z
Yang, J. (2016). Learners’ oral corrective feedback preferences in relation to their cultural background, proficiency level, and types of error. System, 61, 75–86.
Zhang, Y. (2016). Multimodal teacher input and science learning in a middle school sheltered classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21295
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dian Ardiansah
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62e6b/62e6b8687636f55b702ab35d2de0bcc665c72932" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.