THE INFLUENCE OF COACHING-BASED ACADEMIC SUPERVISION ON TEACHER PERFORMANCE AT SMA NEGERI 1 AMURANG AND SMA NEGERI 1 MOTOLING

Swingly Suriadi Yesaya Liow; Jeffry S.J Lengkong; Deitje A. Katuuk

doi:10.62567/micjo.v3i2.2401

Authors

Swingly Suriadi Yesaya Liow Manado State University
Jeffry S.J Lengkong Manado State University
Deitje A. Katuuk Manado State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62567/micjo.v3i2.2401

Keywords:

Academic Supervision, Coaching, Teacher Performance

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of coaching-based academic supervision on teacher performance at SMA Negeri 1 Amurang and SMA Negeri 1 Motoling. The study employed a quantitative approach with an explanatory design. The population consisted of 122 teachers, all of whom were included as the sample using a saturated sampling technique. Data were collected through a Likert-scale questionnaire that had been tested for validity and reliability. Data analysis included descriptive analysis, prerequisite tests, and simple linear regression. The results showed that coaching-based academic supervision does not have a significant effect on teacher performance (p > 0.05). The coefficient of determination (R²) value of 0.013 indicates that the contribution of coaching-based academic supervision to teacher performance is very low, accounting for only 1.3%, while most of the variation in teacher performance is influenced by other factors outside the research model. These findings indicate that coaching-based academic supervision has not been able to directly improve teacher performance, especially when its implementation is not carried out consistently and in depth. This study emphasizes that the effectiveness of coaching-based supervision is contextual and highly dependent on the quality of implementation and the support of the school’s organizational environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Campbell, P. F., & Malkus, N. N. (2011). The impact of elementary mathematics coaches on student achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 111(3), 430–454. https://doi.org/10.1086/657654

Cordingley, P., Higgins, S., & Greany, T. (2023). Developing great teaching: Professional learning and development. Education Development Trust.

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2022). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.

Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2014). Resilient teachers, resilient schools: Building and sustaining quality in testing times. Routledge.

Desimone, L. M., & Pak, K. (2022). Instructional coaching and teacher change. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737221082123

Garet, M. S., Wayne, A. J., Stancavage, F., Taylor, J., & Walters, K. (2021). The impact of coaching on teacher practice. American Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312211000000

Hattie, J. (2015). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Knight, J., & van Nieuwerburgh, C. (2019). Instructional coaching: A partnership approach to improving instruction. Corwin.

Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2021). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 41(1–2), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077

O’Reilly, M., & Langelotz, L. (2019). Coaching as a professional development approach in education. Professional Development in Education, 45(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1529610

Pas, E. T., Bradshaw, C. P., & Hershfeldt, P. A. (2015). Teacher coaching in schools: Improving teacher practices and student outcomes. School Psychology Review, 44(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.17105/spr-44-1-3-19

Prenger, R., Poortman, C. L., & Handelzalts, A. (2019). Factors influencing teachers’ professional development in learning communities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102909

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational behavior (18th ed.). Pearson.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective. Springer.

Sims, S., Fletcher-Wood, H., O’Mara-Eves, A., Cottingham, S., Stansfield, C., Van Herwegen, J., & Anders, J. (2021). What are the characteristics of teacher professional development that increase pupil achievement? Education Endowment Foundation.

Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2017). Motivation and teacher burnout. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.006

Nawas, N. (2023). Supervisi akademik dan peningkatan kinerja guru. Jurnal Pendidikan.

Soro, S. (2024). Kinerja guru dan faktor-faktor yang memengaruhinya. Jurnal Pendidikan.