INTEGRATING LEARNING THEORIES, TEACHING METHODS, AND EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT ACROSS LANGUAGE, MATHEMATICS, AND LEGAL AWARENESS IN ELEMENTARY EDUCATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62567/micjo.v3i1.1845Keywords:
Learning Theory, Teaching Methods, Elementary Education, Assessment, Qualitative Study.Abstract
Elementary education requires coherent integration of learning theories, subject-specific teaching methods, and sound assessment practices to support students’ holistic development. This study aims to examine the implementation of learning theories and instructional methods across multiple subject areas, including basic legal awareness, listening skills in language learning, mathematics learning methodology, elementary school mathematics, educational assessment, and educational evaluation. The research employed a descriptive qualitative approach and was conducted at SD Negeri No. 101390 Batang Pane-I, Desa Batang Pane-I. Data were collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews with teachers, and documentation analysis. The findings indicate that student-centered and contextual teaching methods grounded in constructivist learning theory enhance student engagement and conceptual understanding across subjects. Moreover, formative assessment and reflective evaluation practices play a crucial role in improving instructional quality and learning outcomes. The study highlights the importance of integrating pedagogical theory, subject methodology, and assessment as a unified framework for effective elementary education.
Downloads
References
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9640-2
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dignath, C., Buettner, G., & Langfeldt, H. P. (2008). How can primary school students be supported in self-regulated learning? Educational Research Review, 3(2), 101–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.02.001
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Wearne, D., Murray, H., Olivier, A., & Human, P. (2005). Teaching mathematics for understanding. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 59(1–3), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-4684-4
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Education.
Stiggins, R. J. (2005). Student-involved assessment for learning. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 21–26.
Torrance, H. (2012). Formative assessment at the crossroads. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 24(4), 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-012-9159-9
UNESCO. (2019). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. Paris: UNESCO.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zepke, N., & Leach, L. (2010). Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(3), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787410379680
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Akhirur Rhomadon Matondang, Riswan Saleh, Hamka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
