THE EFFECTS OF A SOCIAL-EMOTIONAL LEARNING (SEL) CURRICULUM ON ACADEMIC RESILIENCE AND PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR IN HIGH-POVERTY PRIMARY SCHOOLS AT SDN NO.100907 MUARA AMPOLU I KECAMATAN MUARA BATANGTORU
Abstract
This study examines the effects of a Social-Emotional Learning (SEL) curriculum on academic resilience and prosocial behavior in high-poverty primary schools, specifically at SDN No. 100907 Muara Ampolu I, Kec. Muara Batangtoru. Employing a quasi-experimental design with a pretest-posttest control group, 80 students participated, divided equally into intervention and control groups. The 12-week SEL program focused on self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills, and responsible decision-making. Data were collected using validated academic resilience and prosocial behavior instruments and analyzed through paired and independent sample t-tests. Findings revealed that students in the intervention group demonstrated significant improvements in academic resilience and prosocial behavior compared to the control group. The study highlights the potential of SEL curricula to foster adaptive coping strategies and positive social interactions among students in socioeconomically disadvantaged settings. Implications for educational policy and school practices are discussed, emphasizing the importance of SEL integration in primary education
Monthly Statistics (Last 12 Months)
References
-
Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
-
CASEL. (2020). What is SEL? Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. Retrieved from https://casel.org/what-is-sel/
-
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta‐analysis of school‐based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
-
Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2015). Prosocial development. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science (Vol. 3, pp. 610–656). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy315
-
Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00164
-
Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2006). Academic resilience and its psychological and educational correlates: A construct validity approach. Psychology in the Schools, 43(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20149
-
OECD. (2020). Education at a Glance 2020: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/69096873-en
-
Payton, J., Weissberg, R. P., Durlak, J. A., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., Schellinger, K. B., & Pachan, M. (2008). The Positive Impact of Social and Emotional Learning for Kindergarten to Eighth-Grade Students: Findings from Three Scientific Reviews. Chicago, IL: Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL).
-
Taylor, R. D., Oberle, E., Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2017). Promoting positive youth development through school-based social and emotional learning interventions: A meta-analysis of follow-up effects. Child Development, 88(4), 1156–1171. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12864
-
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
Issue
