RESEARCH PARADIGMS AND METHODS

Donna Boedi Maritasari; Dina Fitri Sulastri; Jumiarti Septiani; Arya Anggara

doi:10.62567/micjo.v3i3.2904

Authors

Donna Boedi Maritasari Hamzanwadi University
Dina Fitri Sulastri Hamzanwadi University
Jumiarti Septiani Hamzanwadi University
Arya Anggara Hamzanwadi University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62567/micjo.v3i3.2904

Keywords:

Research Paradigms, Research Methods, Positivism, Pragmatism, Mixed Methods

Abstract

Research paradigms and research methods are two fundamental components that determine the quality, consistency, and credibility of scientific research. However, there are still misunderstandings regarding the relationship between research paradigms and research methods, particularly in determining the approach that best suits the research objectives. This study aims to analyze the concept of research paradigms and their relationship to the selection of research methods. The study employs a qualitative approach using library research through the analysis of various relevant scientific sources, including books, journal articles, and conference proceedings. Data were analyzed using content analysis to identify and synthesize various concepts related to research paradigms and methods. The results indicate that research paradigms—such as positivism, post-positivism, interpretivism, constructivism, pragmatism, and the critical paradigm—possess distinct characteristics that influence the selection of research methods. Furthermore, the pragmatist paradigm serves as the dominant foundation for the use of mixed methods. This study makes a theoretical contribution by clarifying the relationship between research paradigms and research methods and serves as a practical reference for researchers in determining the appropriate research approach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). Sage Publications.

Leavy, P. (2022). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. Guilford Publications.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Sugiyono. (2023). Qualitative Research Methods. Alfabeta.

Zed, M. (2018). Literature Review Research Methods (3rd ed.). Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Santos-Trigo, M. (2019). The use of digital technologies in problem solving. In P. Liljedahl & M. Santos-Trigo (Eds.), Mathematical problem solving: Current themes, trends, and research (pp. 63–89). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10472-6_4

Aramide, K. A., Jacob, U. S., & Pillay, J. (2023). Conceptualization and contextualization of mixed-methods research: A review. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 8(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.2023.31

Hampson, T., & McKinley, J. (2023). Problems posing as solutions: Criticizing pragmatism as a paradigm for mixed research. Research Papers in Education, 38(6), 784–801. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2022.2153007

Mukumbang, F. C. (2023). Retroductive theorizing: A contribution of critical realism to mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221126802

Pilcher, N., & Cortazzi, M. (2024). Qualitative and quantitative methods and approaches across subject fields: Implications for research values, assumptions, and practices. Quality & Quantity, 58(3), 2357–2387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01734-4

Elgeddawy, M., & Abouraia, M. (2024). Pragmatism as a research paradigm. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies (Vol. 23, pp. 112–120). Academic Conferences International.