ADMINISTRATION OF FASAKH JUDGMENTS IN THE DISSOLUTION OF MUSLIM MARRIAGES IN INDONESIA AND MALAYSIA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LEGAL BASES, REGISTRATION PROCEDURES, AND THE ISSUANCE OF DIVORCE DOCUMENTS

Authors

  • Deris Arista Saputra Universiti Sultan Azlan Shah
  • Zul-kifli Hussin Universiti Sultan Azlan Shah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62567/micjo.v3i3.2467

Keywords:

Judgment Administration, Fasakh, Dissolution of Marriage, Divorce Certificate, Islamic Divorce Certificate

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the administration of fasakh judgments in the dissolution of Muslim marriages in Indonesia and Malaysia, with specific attention to the legal bases, registration procedures, and issuance of divorce documents. This issue is significant because the dissolution of marriage does not end with a court judgment. It continues through administrative registration, which determines the legal status of the parties after divorce. This study adopts a qualitative approach with a documentation-based comparative case study design. Data were collected through an examination of statutory regulations, judicial technical guidelines, official service procedures, institutional documents, and administrative information applicable to the Religious Courts in Indonesia, as well as the Syariah Courts and State Islamic Religious Departments in Malaysia. This study does not involve interviews or participants because its focus is directed toward the objective mapping of applicable administrative procedures. The data were analysed using a comparative thematic approach by grouping the findings into three main themes: the legal basis of judicial authority, post-judgment registration procedures, and the forms of divorce documents issued. The findings show that Indonesia integrates the issuance of divorce certificates into the administration of the Religious Courts, whereas Malaysia places the issuance of Islamic divorce certificates within the institutional relationship between the Syariah Courts and the State Islamic Religious Departments. These findings affirm that fasakh is not merely a juristic concept or a ground for marital dissolution, but also forms part of the legal documentation system of Islamic family law. This study contributes to the development of comparative Islamic family law scholarship and provides a basis for mapping Muslim divorce administration policies in both countries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, S. K. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2, Article 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051

Ahmed, S. K., Mohammed, R. A., Nashwan, A. J., Ibrahim, R. H., Abdalla, A. Q., Ameen, B. M. M., & Khdhir, R. M. (2025). Using thematic analysis in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 6, Article 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100198

Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206

Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2025). Marriage, divorce and rujuk statistics, Malaysia, 2025. Department of Statistics Malaysia.

Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Agama. (2025). Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Badan Peradilan Agama Nomor 932/DJA/SK.TI1.3.3/VII/2025 tentang petunjuk pelaksanaan administrasi penerbitan salinan putusan dan akta cerai di lingkungan Peradilan Agama secara elektronik. Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.

Jabatan Kehakiman Syariah Malaysia. (2021). Perceraian: Pembubaran perkahwinan. Jabatan Kehakiman Syariah Malaysia.

MyGovernment Malaysia. (n.d.-a). Mendaftar perceraian Islam. Portal Rasmi Kerajaan Malaysia.

MyGovernment Malaysia. (n.d.-b). Pendaftaran cerai (SPPIM). Portal Rasmi Kerajaan Malaysia.

Priya, A. (2021). Case study methodology of qualitative research: Key attributes and navigating the conundrums in its application. Sociological Bulletin, 70(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022920970318

Saputra, D. A., & Hussin, Z. (2025). The evolution of fasakh in Indonesia and Malaysia: A legal comparative bibliometric review. DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum, 23(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v23i1.11332

Shodikin, A., Saepullah, A., & Lestari, I. I. (2021). Efektivitas penerapan sistem e-court Pengadilan Agama dalam perkara perceraian. Jurnal Mediasas: Media Ilmu Syari’ah dan Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah, 4(2), 135–148.

Yuni, L. A., & Haries, A. (2024). Protection of women’s rights after divorce in religious courts: What makes this mission difficult to achieve? Mazahib, 23(2), 595–630. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v23i2.7958

Published

2026-07-11

How to Cite

Saputra, D. A., & Hussin, Z.- kifli. (2026). ADMINISTRATION OF FASAKH JUDGMENTS IN THE DISSOLUTION OF MUSLIM MARRIAGES IN INDONESIA AND MALAYSIA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LEGAL BASES, REGISTRATION PROCEDURES, AND THE ISSUANCE OF DIVORCE DOCUMENTS. Multidisciplinary Indonesian Center Journal (MICJO), 3(3), 3523–3529. https://doi.org/10.62567/micjo.v3i3.2467