DECENTRALIZATION AND TOURISM DEVELOPMENT: COMPARING PUBLIC ADMIISTRATION STRATEGIES FOR TOURISM IN PADANG CITY AND BUKITTINGGI CITY

Authors

  • Diga Putri Oktaviane Mohammad Natsir Bukittinggi University
  • Harapan Tua Riau University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62567/micjo.v3i1.1628

Keywords:

governance, tourism, policy, decentralizations

Abstract

This research examines how decentralization policy in Indonesia shapes public administration strategies in tourism destination development across two major cities in West Sumatera: Padang City and Bukittinggi City, which possess distinct geographical characteristics, governmental structures, and fiscal capacities. Through a comparative literature study finds that Padang City adopts a coastal modernization strategy oriented toward infrastructure and MICE (Meetings, Incentives, Conventions, and Exhibitions), whereas Bukittinggi City develops a heritage conservation and community based governance approach. Decentralizations demonstrates a characteristics of asymmetrical governance, where fiscal capacity and geographical context significantly determine the local government’s ability to formulate tourism strategies. This study contributes to the theory of destination governance and decentralizations by ooffering the perspective that regional autonomy does not automatically enhance policy effectiveness: rather, it must be supported by institutional capacity, collaboration, and policy fit with the unique characteristics of the tourist destination.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andhika, W.(2022). Coastal Resilience in Urban Beach Destinations. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reductiion, 68,

Anggraini, F. (2022). Model Pengembangan Pariwisata heritage di kota Kecil Indonesia. Jurnal Pariwisata pesona, 7 (1), 45-59

Bovens, M., and Zouridis, S. (2020). Policy Processes and Public Sector Governance Frameworks. Governance, 33(2), 211-228.

Dunn, W.(2018). Public Policy Analysis (6th ed). Routledge

Errichielo, L., and Micera, R, (2021). Leveraging Smart Tourism Technologies for Sustainable Destination Development. Journal of Destination Marketing and Management, 20, 100-574

Fitrani, F., Hofman, B., and Kaiser, K. (2019). The Dynamics of Indonesia’s Decentralization: Capturing the Realities. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 55 (2), 137-159.

Hall, C.M. (2011). Policy Learning and Policy Failure in Sustainable Tourism Governance. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19 (4-5), 411-421.

Herawati, R. (2024). Konflik Pemanfaatan Ruang Kawasan Pesisir di Kota Metropolitan. Jurnal Tata Kelola Wilayah, 5(1), 91-104

Kim, J., and Lee, S. (2020). Urban Coastal Tourism and Infrastructure Policy: a Comparative study. Ocean and Coastal Management, 188, 105-147

Rondinelli, D.A. (2020). Decentralization, Development, and Public Sector Reform. Public Administration and Development, 40 (3), 180-195

Ritchie, J.R.B., and Crouch, G. (2003). The Competitive Destinantion: A Sustainable Tourism Perspective. CABI Publishing

Sari, D. (2021). Overtourism dan Kapasitas Destinasi di Kota Wisata Heritage. Jurnal Kepariwisataan Indonesia, 12(2), 112-124

Syahputra, M.(2023). Koordinasi Lintas Sektor Dalam Kebijakan Pariwisata Daerah. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 9(1), 11-29

Suwena, I., and Widyatmaja, I. (2022). Tantangan tata Kelola Pariwisata Daerah Pasca Desentralisasi. Jurnal Master Pariwisata, 6(3), 67-83

Tanaya, A., and Rahayu, F.(2016). Community Based Tourism dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Lokal. Jurnal Ilmu Pariwisata, 2(2), 33-47.

Published

2026-01-15

How to Cite

Diga Putri Oktaviane, & Harapan Tua. (2026). DECENTRALIZATION AND TOURISM DEVELOPMENT: COMPARING PUBLIC ADMIISTRATION STRATEGIES FOR TOURISM IN PADANG CITY AND BUKITTINGGI CITY. Multidisciplinary Indonesian Center Journal (MICJO), 3(1), 472–476. https://doi.org/10.62567/micjo.v3i1.1628

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.