ANALYSIS OF THE CIVIL DECISION EXECUTION MECHANISM IN THE INDONESIAN JUDICIAL SYSTEM

Divani Tsamara Madiyya; Naurah Alfi Mufidah Anwar; Amandha Ayu Bunga Syabina; Nazwa Wahdatul Hilaliyah; Kesya Putri Kuswara; Frederika Eugene; Carolyn Victoria; Yuni Priskila Ginting

doi:10.62567/micjo.v3i1.1531

Authors

Divani Tsamara Madiyya Pelita Harapan University
Naurah Alfi Mufidah Anwar Pelita Harapan University
Amandha Ayu Bunga Syabina Pelita Harapan University
Nazwa Wahdatul Hilaliyah Pelita Harapan University
Kesya Putri Kuswara Pelita Harapan University
Frederika Eugene Pelita Harapan University
Carolyn Victoria Pelita Harapan University
Yuni Priskila Ginting Pelita Harapan University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62567/micjo.v3i1.1531

Keywords:

civil judgment execution, HIR, legal obstacles, execution mechanisms, legal certainty.

Abstract

The last phase that assesses the efficiency of law enforcement in the Indonesian legal system is the execution of civil decisions. Despite having a solid legal foundation thanks to the Reglement Buitengewesten (RBg) and the Herzien Inlandsch Reglement (HIR), its execution frequently encounters a number of challenges. The purpose of this study is to examine how civil judgments are carried out, including the legal foundation, several forms of execution (such as real, payment of money, and vacating), stages of implementation (such as aanmaning, execution seizure, and forceful execution), and practical challenges. Normative juridical study using a conceptual and statutory approach is the methodology employed. The study's findings show that the primary causes of execution failure are non-legal barriers like social opposition and a lack of official backing, as well as legal barriers like verzet, derden verzet, and ambiguous verdicts. Effective, efficient, and equitable execution of civil judgments requires systemic change and interagency cooperation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dance Mauboy, Y., Kopong Medan, K., & Sinurat, A. (2023). Kekuatan Eksekutorial Putusan Perkara Perdata Terhadap Objek Eksekusi Yang Disita Oleh Jaksa Dalam Perkara Pidana Di Pengadilan Negeri. Jurnal Locus Penelitian Dan Pengabdian, 2(6), 596–616. https://doi.org/10.58344/locus.v2i6.1285

Gaol, P. L., Anshari, M. F., & ... (2024). Problematika Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan dalam Perkara Tanah Studi Perkara: Putusan PN PRAYA Nomor 24/Pdt. Bth/2019/PN Pya. Jurnal Ilmiah …, 2(6), 330–335. https://ejurnal.kampusakademik.my.id/index.php/jipm/article/view/559%0Ahttps://ejurnal.kampusakademik.my.id/index.php/jipm/article/download/559/506

Hatta, M., Anditya, A. W., Rayhan, A., Akhmaddhian, S., & Anugrah, D. (2024). The Legal Hurdles in Executing Land Dispute Cases in Court. Unifikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 11(02), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.25134/unifikasi.v11i02.771

Herlambang, T., Nurwidiatmo, & Kadira, T. (2017). Kepastian Hukum Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Terhadap Perjanjian Yang Telah Disahkan (Homologasi). Jurnal Nuansa Kenotariatan, 3(1), 23–32.

I Wayan Yasa, & Echwan Iriyanto. (2023). Kepastian Hukum Putusan Hakim Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perkara Perdata. Jurnal Rechtens, 12(1), 33–48. https://ejurnal.uij.ac.id/index.php/REC/article/view/1957

Marwing, A., & Mustaming, M. (2024). Problematika Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Perkara Perdata Di Pengadilan Agama (Studi Kasus Pengadilan Agama Tana Luwu). Al-Mizan, 20(1), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.30603/am.v20i1.4714

Phireri, Rahman, M. S., Paluaran, D., & Makmur, A. F. (2022). Analisis Terhadap Pelaksanaan Putusan (Eksekusi) Perkara Perdata. Julia Jurnal Litigasi Amsir, 10(1), 43–46. http://journalstih.amsir.ac.id/

Ralang Hartati, S. (2021). Hambatan dalam Eksekusi Perkara Perdata. ADIL: Jurnal Hukum, 12(1), 88–105.

Rifki Firzatullah, M., Ilmar Irawan, B., Akmal Rohmatino, H., Jajuly, R., & Munawar, F. (2024). Analisis Problematika Lelang Sebagai Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan dalam Perkara Perdata. Journal of Multidisciplinary Inquiry in Science Technology and Educational Research, 1(4), 2489–2505. https://doi.org/10.32672/mister.v1i4.2294

Runtu, G. M. ., Soekromo, D., & Kasenda, V. D. . (2024). Prosedur Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Dalam Perkara Perdata. Jurnal Fakultas Hukum UNSRAT, 12(4), 1–12.

Sintara, D., & Marzuki, M. (2021). the Relevance of Pancasila Justice in Implementing State Administrative Court Decisions. International Journal of Law Reconstruction, 5(1), 151. https://doi.org/10.26532/ijlr.v5i1.15646

Taluke, A. (2013). Eksekusi Terhadap Perkara Perdata Yang Telah Mempunyai Kekuatan Hukum Tetap (Ingkraah) Atas Perintah Hakim Dibawah Pimpinan Ketua Pengadilan Negeri. Lex Privatum, 1(4), 24–35. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/3060

Utami, T. R., Apriliandi, G., Akbar, F. M., Wandono, H., & Destia, I. W. (2023). Eksekusi Putusan dan Implikasi Hukum Bagi Pihak yang Tidak Patuh dalam Perkara Perdata. Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum, 16(01), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.59582/sh.v16i01.924

Wati Trisnawati. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Yang Tidak Dapat Dilakukan Eksekusi (Non Executable). 2(7), 1–9.

Wulansari, R. (2015). Hambatan dalam Proses Eksekusi Putusan terhadap Pemeliharaan Anak dalam Perkara Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v4i2.1987