EVALUATION OF THE RETURN ON INVESTMENT FOR THE SCIENCEDIRECT SUBSCRIPTION: EVIDENCE FROM RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY, CITATION IMPACT, AND ALTMETRICS AT THE UNIVERSITAS TERBUKA (2024–2026)

Mohamad Pandu Ristiyono; Nasywaa Sabina Bashayeva

doi:10.62567/micjo.v3i3.3028

Authors

Mohamad Pandu Ristiyono Universitas Terbuka Library Center
Nasywaa Sabina Bashayeva State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62567/micjo.v3i3.3028

Keywords:

Sciencedirect, Return on Investment, Bibliometrics, COUNTER, Research Productivity, Academic Libraries, Open and Distance Learning

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the return on investment (ROI) of ScienceDirect subscriptions at Universitas Terbuka during the 2024–2026 period by examining research productivity, publication characteristics, and scholarly impact beyond conventional usage statistics. Rather than assessing subscription value solely through download counts, this study adopts a value-based assessment approach that integrates research performance indicators. A quantitative descriptive design with a bibliometric approach was employed. The dataset comprised 31 Scopus-indexed publications affiliated with Universitas Terbuka published between 2024 and 2026. Data were analyzed using publication productivity, citation performance, publication outlets, publisher distribution, and collaboration patterns. The findings indicate relatively stable research productivity, with 12 publications in 2024, 10 in 2025, and 9 in 2026. Publications were disseminated across various international publishers, predominantly Emerald, Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, AIP Publishing, and Springer Nature, while no publication in the analyzed dataset appeared in Elsevier journals hosted on ScienceDirect. These findings suggest that the primary value of ScienceDirect lies not in serving as a publication destination but in functioning as a strategic knowledge infrastructure that supports literature discovery, research design, and scholarly writing. Consequently, evaluating subscription ROI should extend beyond COUNTER usage statistics and incorporate research productivity, citation impact, collaboration, and alternative metrics to capture broader institutional benefits. This study contributes a multidimensional framework for assessing electronic resource investments in academic libraries and provides empirical evidence to support evidence-based collection management and research policy in open and distance higher education institutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Association of College and Research Libraries. (2023). Standards for Libraries in Higher Education.

Donthu, Naveen et al. (2021). How to Conduct a Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Business Research. COUNTER. (2023). Code of Practice Release 5.1.

Emery, J., Estelle, L., & Adams, S. J. (2021). COUNTER 5: Lessons Learned and New Insights Achieved. The Serials Librarian. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0361526X.2021.1884489?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Getsay, H., & Chen-Gaffey, A. (2021). Understanding COUNTER 5 Metrics in Context: A Case Study on Vendor Database Usage Reports. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1297462&utm_source=chatgpt.com

Kaba, A., El Refae, G. A., Eletter, S., & Yasmin, T. (2022). Testing a Proposed ROI for Academic Libraries. Library Hi Tech News. https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/abs/pii/S074190582200022X?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Kaba, A. (2022). A Theoretical Framework on Return on Investment (ROI) in Academic Libraries. Library Hi Tech News. https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/abs/pii/S0741905822000437?utm_source=chatgpt.com

McGinnis, R., Richey, N., & Kinder, L. S. (2023). Libraries and Value Propositions: Worth the Investment? The Journal of Academic Librarianship. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009913332200115X?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Springer.

Oakleaf, M. (2010). The Value of Academic Libraries. Association of College and Research Libraries.

Oakleaf, M. (2017). Academic Library Value: The Impact Starter Kit. ALA Editions. https://libris.kb.se/q82jjz222jt8nh2

Oakleaf, Megan. (2021). The Value of Academic Libraries. Association of College and Research Libraries.

Pan, D., Williams, T., Wiersma, G., & Fong, B. (2013). More Than a Number: Unexpected Benefits of Return on Investment Analysis. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0099133313000608?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Poll, R. (2022). Measuring the Impact and Value of Library Services. De Gruyter.

Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., & Neylon, C. (2010). Altmetrics: A Manifesto.

Sugimoto, C. R., Work, S., Larivière, V., & Haustein, S. (2017). Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9), 2037–2062.

Tenopir, C., et al. (2020). Beyond usage statistics: Measuring the value of electronic resources for research. The Journal of Academic Librarianship.

Tenopir, C. (2010). Measuring the Value of the Academic Library: Return on Investment and Other Value Measures. The Serials Librarian. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03615261003623005?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Waltman, L. (2016). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 365–391.