ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING (EMA) IN DISCLOSING ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS UNDER THE METRICS AND TARGETS PILLAR OF THE TASK FORCE ON CLIMATE-RELATED FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES (TCFD): ANALYSIS OF CONTRIBUTION TO SDG 13 (CLIMATE ACTION) IN COAL COMPANIES LISTED ON THE INDONESIA STOCK EXCHANGE FOR THE PERIOD 2022–2024

Siti Radia; Tri Handayani Amaliah; Mahdalena Mahdalena

doi:10.62567/micjo.v3i2.2388

Authors

Siti Radia Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Tri Handayani Amaliah Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Mahdalena Mahdalena Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62567/micjo.v3i2.2388

Keywords:

Environmental Management Accounting, TCFD, Environmental Risk Disclosure, SDG 13, Coal Companies

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role of Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) in disclosing environmental risks under the metrics and targets pillar of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), as well as its contribution to the achievement of SDG 13 (Climate Action) in coal companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2022–2024. This research employs a descriptive quantitative approach using secondary data obtained from sustainability reports. The sample consists of 17 coal companies selected through purposive sampling, resulting in 51 observations. Data analysis is conducted using content analysis with a dummy scoring method based on 17 indicators of the TCFD metrics and targets pillar. The results indicate that the level of environmental risk disclosure shows an increasing trend, from 37.71% in 2022 to 48.44% in 2024. However, the overall level remains moderate, indicating that companies are still in a transition phase toward more mature climate reporting practices. Basic indicators such as total emissions and Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions are widely disclosed, while advanced indicators such as Scope 3 emissions and emission reduction targets remain limited. The findings also reveal that the contribution to SDG 13 is uneven: strong in providing baseline emission data, moderate in emission intensity efficiency, and weak in comprehensive inventory and long-term mitigation strategies. Furthermore, companies are categorized into three groups—best practice, intermediate, and resistant—based on their level of disclosure and EMA readiness. Companies with more developed EMA systems demonstrate stronger contributions to climate action. Overall, the study concludes that the coal sector shows positive but not yet optimal alignment with SDG 13, requiring improvements in methodological transparency, Scope 3 measurement, and science-based emission targets.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arsylia, S., & Suhartini, D. (2025). Literatur Review : Pengaruh Stalkholerds Pressure. 4(April), 916–921. https://doi.org/10.36441/snpk.vol4.2025.418

Bartolomeo, M., Bennett, M., Bouma, J. J., James, P., & Wolters, T. (2000). Environmental Management Accounting in Europe : current practice and future potential. 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/096381800407932

Burritt, R. L., Hahn, T., & Schaltegger, S. T. (2002). Towards a comprehensive framework for Environmental Management Accounting - Links between business actors and Environmental Management Accounting tools. Australian Accounting Review, 12(27), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-2561.2002.tb00202.x

Burritt, R. L., & Schaltegger, S. (2023). Environmental Management Accounting – Developments Over the Last 20 years from a Framework Perspective. 33(107), 336–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12407

Daton, V. N., & Meiden, C. (2024). Kualitas Pengungkapan Pelaporan Iklim Dengan Rekomendasi Tcfd Perusahaan Metal-Mining Dan Banks Tahun 2020-2022. Juremi: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, 3(4), 497–504. https://www.bajangjournal.com/index.php/Juremi/article/view/7405%0Ahttps://www.bajangjournal.com/index.php/Juremi/article/download/7405/5757

Graf-vlachy, L., & Hettler, M. (2024). Why Firms Are Not Reporting Their Scope 3 CO2 Emissions.

Haalebos, R., Science, D., Olesiewicz, M., Science, D., Simmons, J., Lead, C. S., Jain, M., Kooroshy, J., & Head, G. (2024). Scope for improvement. January.

Huynh, Q. L., & Nguyen, V. K. (2024). The Role of Environmental Management Accounting in Sustainability. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(17), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177440

IEA. (2025). Global Energy Review 2025. 43. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/5b169aa1-bc88-4c96-b828-aaa50406ba80/GlobalEnergyReview2025.pdf

Indarto, B. A., & Tantra, A. R. (2024). Pengembangan Model Pengukuran dan Pelaporan ‬ ‭ di Bidang ‬ Green Accounting ‬ ‭ dalam Transisi Menuju Ekonomi Rendah Karbon ‬. 5, 119–130.‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬

Maria, E. O., & Carmen, M. (2023). Kualitas Pengungkapan Emisi Karbon Pada Laporan Keberlanjutan Perusahaan Yang Terdaftar Berdasarkan Indeks Sri Kehati Periode 2018 – 2022. Jurnal Akuntansi, 13(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.46806/ja.v13i1.1033

Nelson, N., & Meiden, C. (2023). Implementasi Prinsip Isi dan Kualitas pada Laporan Keberlanjutan. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 23(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v23i1.2965

NOAA. (2024). Global Climate Report Annual 2024. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/monthly-report/global/202413

Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2017). POJK No. 51 /POJK.03/2017 tentang penerapan keuangan berkelanjutan bagi lembaga jasa keuangan, emiten, dan perusahaan publik. 1–15.

PPN/Bappenas. (2020). Pedoman Teknis Penyusunan Rencana Aksi Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan (TPB)/ Sustainable Devepment Goals (SDGs).

TCFD. (2017). Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. Task Force on Climate-Related Fiancial Disclosures, June, 1–74.

UNDP. (2015). The SDGs in action. What are the Sustainable Development Goals? Retrieved from United Nations Development Programme. 1–7.