DEFINING AN OPTIMAL EV CHARGING SERVICE RADIUS: A USER-BASED APPROACH FOR URBAN PLANNING IN PEKANBARU CITY

Authors

  • Ardiansyah Putra University of Riau
  • Wan Muhammad Yunus University of Riau
  • Zulkarnain Umar University of Riau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62567/micjo.v3i2.2446

Keywords:

Electric Vehicles, EV Charging Stations, Service Distance, Spatial Planning, Sustainable Transport, User Preference

Abstract

The growing emphasis on sustainable urban mobility has positioned electric vehicles (EVs) as a strategic component of transport transformation, particularly in developing cities with constrained infrastructure systems. One of the key challenges in supporting EV adoption is the provision of accessible charging infrastructure, which is closely related to user perception of acceptable service distance. This study aims to determine the optimal service distance of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations (EVCS) based on user preferences in Pekanbaru City, Indonesia, and to explore its implications for spatial planning. A quantitative approach was employed using a questionnaire survey of 51 respondents distributed across 15 administrative districts. All respondents were non-EV users, representing potential adopters in the early stage of transition. The survey captured preferred EVCS distance using interval-based categories, along with respondents’ awareness and intention toward EV adoption. The results indicate that the dominant preferred distance falls within the 2–4 km range, with an estimated mean of 3.08 km and a standard deviation of 1.98 km, resulting in an effective range of approximately 1–5 km. Considering urban road network constraints and detour factors, this range is further adjusted to 3–6 km to reflect more realistic travel conditions. These findings suggest that a relatively dense and accessible charging network is required to reduce range anxiety and support EV adoption. From a spatial planning perspective, a 4 km service threshold is proposed as a practical reference for EVCS deployment, representing the central tendency of user preferences within the adjusted range. This study highlights the importance of integrating user-based spatial parameters into infrastructure planning and contributes to the literature by emphasizing the role of perceived accessibility in shaping EV infrastructure demand in developing urban contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Gnann, T., Stephens, T. S., Lin, Z., Plötz, P., Liu, C., & Brokate, J. (2018). What drives the market for plug-in electric vehicles? A review of international PEV market diffusion models. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 93, 158–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.055

International Energy Agency (IEA). (2019). Global EV outlook 2019: Analysis and policy recommendations. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/35fb60bd-en

International Energy Agency (IEA). (2022). An energy sector roadmap to net zero emissions in Indonesia. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/b496b141-8c3b-47fc-adb2-90740eb0b3b8/AnEnergySectorRoadmaptoNetZeroEmissionsinIndonesia.pdf

International Energy Agency (IEA). (2024). Global EV outlook 2024. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2024

Lehmann, S. (2010). Transforming the City for Sustainability: The Principles of Green Urbanism. Earthscan/Routledge. 10.3992/jgb.6.1.104

Pew Research Center. (2024). Electric vehicle charging infrastructure in the U.S. https://www.pewresearch.org/data-labs/2024/05/23/electric-vehicle-charging-infrastructure-in-the-u-s/

Pevec, D., Babic, J., Carvalho, A., Ghiassi-Farrokhfal, Y., Ketter, W., & Podobnik, V. (2020). A survey-based assessment of how charging infrastructure affects electric vehicle transition. Energies, 13(20), 5406. https://repub.eur.nl/pub/129284/Repub_129284.pdf

PT PLN (Persero). (2026). PLN Mobile Application [Mobile application]. Retrieved January 2026

Rezvani, Z., Jansson, J., & Bodin, J. (2015). Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research: A review and research agenda. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 34, 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.10.010

Rodrigue, J. P. (2020). The geography of transport systems (5th ed.). Routledge.Zaino, R., et al. (2024). Electric vehicle adoption: A comprehensive systematic review of determinants and barriers. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 15(8), 375. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj15080375

Statistics Indonesia (BPS) Pekanbaru Municipality. (2024). Pekanbaru Municipality in Figures 2024 [in Indonesian]. https://pekanbarukota.bps.go.id/publication/2024/02/28/0e92e9d9c971131ee3ea3a54/kota-pekanbaru-dalam-angka-2024.html

Statistics Indonesia (BPS) Pekanbaru Municipality. (2024). Population by District [in Indonesian]. Retrieved January 28, 2026, from https://pekanbarukota.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/MjE1IzI=/jumlah-penduduk-menurut-kecamatan.html

Published

2026-04-28

How to Cite

Putra, A., Yunus, W. M., & Umar, Z. (2026). DEFINING AN OPTIMAL EV CHARGING SERVICE RADIUS: A USER-BASED APPROACH FOR URBAN PLANNING IN PEKANBARU CITY. Multidisciplinary Indonesian Center Journal (MICJO), 3(2), 2765–2772. https://doi.org/10.62567/micjo.v3i2.2446

Similar Articles

<< < 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.