EFFORTS TO RECOVER ASSETS FROM CORRUPTION CRIMES THROUGH OPTIMIZATION OF LEGISLATION IN INDONESIA AND A REVIEW OF THE DRAFT LAW ON ASSET FORFEITURE

Authors

  • Irwan Triadi National Development University Veteran Jakart
  • Bayu Giri Atmojo National Development University Veteran Jakart

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62567/micjo.v3i1.1609

Keywords:

Asset Forfeiture, Corruption, Non-Conviction Based Forfeiture, UNCAC, Asset Recovery.

Abstract

Corruption, as an organized and transnational crime, demands a more effective asset recovery mechanism than the conventional criminal approach currently applied in Indonesia. The limitations of criminal law instruments in tracing, confiscating, and repatriating assets that have been transferred, concealed, or placed outside national jurisdiction form the central background for the urgency of the Asset Forfeiture Bill. This study aims to analyze the concept of asset forfeiture for corruption cases through the non-conviction based forfeiture mechanism and assess the alignment of the Asset Forfeiture Bill with international standards, particularly the UNCAC. The research employs a normative legal method through an examination of legislation, academic literature, international documents, and comparative best practices. The findings indicate that the Bill introduces a new enforcement paradigm through in rem procedures, an integrated asset-tracing system, civil judicial control, and transparent asset management. The discussion reveals that although the Bill has significant potential to enhance state asset recovery, its implementation requires strengthened evidentiary standards, protection of property rights, and improved inter-agency coordination. The study concludes that the Asset Forfeiture Bill represents a strategic instrument for improving the effectiveness of anti-corruption efforts, yet its success depends on procedural safeguards, transparency in asset administration, and the institutional capacity of law enforcement bodies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustine, Oly Viana. RUU Perampasan Aset sebagai Peluang dan Tantangan dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara Mahkamah Konstitusi, diakses 10 September 2025.

Arianto, Andhie Fajar. “Peran Lembaga Penegak Hukum dalam Proses Perampasan Aset.” USM Law Review 7, no. 3 (2024). https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i3.105.

Arianto, Andhie Fajar. “Peran Lembaga Penegak Hukum dalam Proses Perampasan Aset.” USM Law Review, Universitas Semarang, 2024.

Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional. Naskah Akademik Penyelarasan RUU Perampasan Aset. Kementerian Hukum dan HAM.

Draft Final RUU Perampasan Aset. Scribd, 2025.

Draft Final RUU Perampasan Aset. Scribd, diakses 16 September 2025.

Greenberg, Theodore S. Civil Forfeiture: Historical Roots and Contemporary Issues. 2019.

Hafid, Irwan. “Perampasan Aset Tanpa Pemidanaan dalam Perspektif Economic Analysis of Law.” Lex Renaissance, 2021.

Kompas.com. “Pajak Diatur dalam Pasal Berapa di UUD 1945?” 12 April 2025.

Kusuma, Kausar Dwi. Non-Conviction Based Forfeiture: Potensi dan Tantangan. 2019.

Ningsing, Novianti Setu. “Jalan Panjang RUU Perampasan Aset.” Kompas.com, 18 November 2024.

Refki Saputra. Perubahan Paradigma dalam Hukum Pidana: Perampasan Aset. 2017.

Riset Publik. Kajian Perampasan Aset (In Rem) dan Implementasinya di Indonesia. 2019.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 7 Tahun 2006 tentang Pengesahan UNCAC.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Tipikor).

Warta Rakyat Online. “Kemana Larinya Uang Sitaan Ratusan Ribu Triliun?” 9 Maret 2025.

Wijayatama, Divanda Permata, Anita Zulfiani, et al. “Menelisik Urgensi Pengesahan RUU Perampasan Aset.” Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Wijayatama, Divanda Permata, Anita Zulfiani, et al. “Menelisik Urgensi Pengesahan RUU Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana sebagai Efektivitas Penegakan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia.” Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Published

2026-01-15

How to Cite

Irwan Triadi, & Bayu Giri Atmojo. (2026). EFFORTS TO RECOVER ASSETS FROM CORRUPTION CRIMES THROUGH OPTIMIZATION OF LEGISLATION IN INDONESIA AND A REVIEW OF THE DRAFT LAW ON ASSET FORFEITURE. Multidisciplinary Indonesian Center Journal (MICJO), 3(1), 306–315. https://doi.org/10.62567/micjo.v3i1.1609

Similar Articles

<< < 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.