DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN CHILDREN’S ORAL LANGUAGE LEARNING: A CONCEPTUAL NARRATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW OF TEACHER PRACTICES, PEDAGOGICAL CHALLENGES, AND INSTRUCTIONAL RESPONSES IN EARLY CHILDHOOD AND PRIMARY EDUCATION

F. Devi Kurnia; Joko Pamungkas

doi:10.62567/micjo.v3i3.2550

Authors

F. Devi Kurnia Yogyakarta State University
Joko Pamungkas Yogyakarta State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62567/micjo.v3i3.2550

Keywords:

Digital Technology, Oral Language Development, Narrative Literature Review, Early Childhood Education, Primary Education, Teacher Practices, Digital Pedagogy

Abstract

Children’s oral language development is a fundamental component of early literacy, classroom participation, social communication, and later academic achievement. The growing use of digital technologies in early childhood and primary education has created new opportunities for supporting children’s speaking, listening, vocabulary development, storytelling, expressive language, and communicative confidence. However, the pedagogical contribution of digital technologies remains dependent on how teachers design, mediate, assess, and respond to children’s language learning. This article presents a conceptual narrative literature review that maps, integrates, and critically describes theoretical perspectives and empirical findings on the use of digital technologies in children’s oral language learning. The review draws on selected Scopus-indexed studies and relevant theoretical literature on sociocultural theory, scaffolding, pedagogical content knowledge, TPACK, digital play, professional vision, and formative assessment. The analysis identifies four major themes: digital technologies as mediational tools, teacher practices in digitally mediated oral language instruction, pedagogical and institutional challenges, and instructional responses for meaningful digital integration. The findings suggest that digital technologies such as video-recorded performance, SMART boards, e-storybooks, digital drama, robotics-based storytelling, language screening applications, and virtual interactions can support oral language development when embedded in active, dialogic, and teacher-mediated pedagogy. The review concludes that a pedagogy-first approach is needed to ensure that digital technologies are used not as isolated tools, but as resources for scaffolding, dialogue, play, feedback, formative assessment, and children’s active language participation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barakat, A. M. M. A. R. (2023). The effects of digital drama-based instruction on developing receptive and expressive language among kindergarten children. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.1616a

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.

Bruner, J. S. (1983). Child’s talk: Learning to use language. Oxford University Press.

Colognesi, S., Coppe, T., & Lucchini, S. (2023). Improving the oral language skills of elementary school students through video-recorded performances. Teaching and Teacher Education, 128, Article 104141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104141

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.

Edwards, S. (2013). Digital play in the early years: A contextual response to the problem of integrating technologies and play-based pedagogies in the early childhood curriculum. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 21(2), 199-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2013.789190

Edwards, S. (2019). Digital play. In C. Donohue (Ed.), Exploring key issues in early childhood and technology: Evolving perspectives and innovative approaches (pp. 55-62). Routledge.

Fleer, M. (2014). The demands and motives afforded through digital play in early childhood activity settings. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 3(3), 202-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.02.012

Ge, P., Cai, Q. V., & Duan, S. (2026). Facilitating students’ expressive language development through a five-day robotics-based storytelling summer camp. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 17(1), 83-100. https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v17i1.39511

Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606-633. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Justice, L. M., & Ezell, H. K. (2002). Use of storybook reading to increase print awareness in at-risk children. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11(1), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2002/003)

Mathers, S., & Siraj, I. (2021). Researching pre-school teachers’ knowledge of oral language pedagogy using video. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 748347. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.748347

Mercer, N. (2010). The analysis of classroom talk: Methods and methodologies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X479853

Mercer, N., Warwick, P., & Ahmed, A. (2017). An oracy assessment toolkit: Linking research and development in the assessment of students’ spoken language skills at age 11-12. Learning and Instruction, 48, 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.10.005

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Ning, P., DeWitt, D., Chin, H.-L., & Alias, N. (2022). Smart board-based assessment outcomes of implementing outdoor transdisciplinary language instruction for pupils. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 21, 379-402. https://doi.org/10.28945/5007

Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714

Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.

Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108328155

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Tawalah, N. A., & Gaber, S. A. (2023). Improving social communication and social interaction skills in students with autism-spectrum disorder through smart-board use. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(3), 310-324. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.3.19

Turner, E., Mantei, J., & Kervin, L. (2023). Investigating key principles for the design of virtual interactions for children that can support the development of oral language through play. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 46, 105-124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44020-023-00031-9

van Dijken, M. J. (2023). Print referencing during e-storybook reading on a SMART board for kindergartners to promote early literacy skills. Reading and Writing, 36, 97-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10304-3

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press.

West, G., Lervåg, A., Birchenough, J. M. H., Korell, C., Rios Diaz, M., Duta, M., Cripps, D., Gardner, R., Fairhurst, C., & Hulme, C. (2024). Oral language enrichment in preschool improves children’s language skills: A cluster randomised controlled trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 65(8), 1087-1097. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13947